Consulting scope · Curriculum draft · Human-supervised AI

Build engineering agents that expose their work.

I help Energy R&D teams structure bounded agents around approved MATLAB and Simulink tools, deterministic tests, visible evidence, explicit stop conditions, and engineer approval.

Agentic engineering workflow from bounded requirement to engineer approval

Execution contract

Requirement → Plan → Tool → Test → Evidence → Approval

The agent may accelerate analysis and documentation. It does not own the engineering decision.

Syllabus

Seven modules from architecture to accountable output.

01Design bounded engineering agents

Define the objective, permitted actions, unavailable information, stop conditions, and approval authority.

02Structure requirements and technical context

Convert source documents and engineering questions into explicit, traceable working context.

03Invoke MATLAB functions safely

Use typed inputs, unit declarations, output schemas, deterministic scripts, and recorded tool results.

04Inspect Simulink architecture

Read model hierarchy, interfaces, parameters, signal paths, and diagnostics without inventing model intent.

05Verify calculations and artifacts

Run tests, compare tolerances, identify missing evidence, and preserve failed results for review.

06Generate engineering evidence packages

Assemble assumptions, tool calls, outputs, plots, tests, limitations, and unresolved questions.

07Escalate and approve

Stop on missing inputs, failed tests, unsupported assumptions, safety relevance, or unclear authority.

Worked transcript

An illustrative walk-through of the workflow.

Illustrative workflow scenario

BESS thermal safety review

  1. Proposed — The engine proposes a conservative cooldown profile and revised current envelope for a candidate pack design.

  2. Illustrative check — In this hypothetical scenario, checks flag two edge cases outside acceptance bounds, including edge-zone hotspot growth in case 4; no test was run and no evidence package is implied.

  3. Engineer review — The engineer withholds acceptance because the illustrative residuals do not meet safety bounds and requests revised boundary conditions and another validation run.

Illustrative outcome: Human approval remains required; this is not an executed pilot, test result, or field outcome.

Operating principles

Traceability over fluency

A persuasive answer is not evidence. Inputs, transformations, tests, and sources must remain inspectable.

Tools over imitation

Use approved engineering tools for calculations and model inspection instead of asking a language model to approximate them.

Failure remains visible

Do not suppress failed checks, missing files, unsupported assumptions, or uncertainty to produce a cleaner narrative.

Approval stays human

Safety, compliance, release, and acceptance decisions remain with authorized engineers.

Inspectable references

Use tested artifacts as the pattern, not generated claims.

The MATLAB Simulink Energy Lab exposes model checks and release evidence; its focused battery thermal case study keeps equations and assumptions inspectable; VoltRL binds protocol, results, and data provenance; and the BESS QA/QC Toolkit turns status, completeness, deadlines, traceability, and acceptance into reviewable gates. The full open engineering portfolio keeps failed assumptions and engineering boundaries visible.

Bring one bounded workflow, approved toolchain, and review bottleneck.Discuss an agentic engineering workflowInspect the validated model repository